Now it
came to pass that a group existed who called themselves fishermen. And there
were many fish in the waters all around. In fact the whole area was surrounded
by streams and lakes filled with fish. And the fish were hungry.
Week after
week, month after month, and year after year, those who called themselves
fishermen met in meetings and talked about their call to fish, the abundance of
fish, and how they might go about fishing. Year after year they carefully
defined what fishing means, defended fishing as an occupation, and declared that
fishing is always to be a primary task of fishermen.
These fishermen built large, beautiful buildings for local fishing
headquarters. The plea was that everyone should be a fisherman and every
fisherman should fish. One thing they didn't do however, they didn't fish.
In addition to meeting regularly, they organised out fishermen to other
places where there were many fish. The board was formed by those who had the
great vision and courage to speak about fishing, to define fishing, to promote
the idea of fishing in faraway streams and lakes where many other fish of
different colours lived. Also the board hired staffs and appointed committees
and held many meetings to define fishing, to defend fishing, to decide what new
streams should be thought about. But the staff and committee members did not
fish.
Large, elaborate, and expensive training centres were built whose original
and primary purpose was to teach fishermen how to fish. Over the years courses
were offered on the needs of fish, the nature of fish, how to define fish, the
psychological reactions of fish, and how to approach and feed fish. Those who
taught had doctorates in "fishology". But the teachers did not fish. They only
taught fishing.
Further, the fishermen built large printing houses to publish fishing guides.
Presses were kept busy day and night to produce materials solely devoted to
fishing methods, equipment and programmes, to arrange and encourage meetings, to
talk about fishing. A speakers' bureau was also provided to schedule special
speakers on the subject of fishing.
After one stirring meeting on "The Necessity of Fishing", one young fellow
left the meeting and went fishing. The next day he reported that he had caught
two outstanding fish. He was honoured for his excellent catch and scheduled to
visit all the big meetings possible to tell how he did it. So he quit his
fishing in order to have time to tell about the experience to the other
fishermen. He was also placed on the Fishermen's General Board as a person
having considerable experience.
Now it's true that many of the fishermen sacrificed and put up with all kinds
of difficulties. Some lived near the water and bore the smell of dead fish. They
received the ridicule of some who made fun of their fishermen's clubs and the
fact that they claimed to be fishermen yet never fished. They wondered about
those who felt it was of little use to attend and talk about fishing. After all,
were they not following the Master who said, "Follow Me, and I will make you
fishers of men" (Matt. 4:19)?
Imagine how hurt some were when one day a person suggested that those who
didn't fish were not really fishermen, no matter who much they claimed to be. Is
a person a fisherman if, year after year he never catches a fish? Is one
following, if he isn't fishing?
No comments:
Post a Comment